![Show Menu](styles/mobile-menu.png)
![Page Background](./../common/page-substrates/page0015.png)
© 2016, BSM Consulting
13
Basics of Glaucoma
Visual Field Testing
Various tests can determine the extent, if any, or progression of peripheral visual field loss as a result of
glaucoma. Visual field is defined as the “full extent of the area visible to an eye that is fixating straight
ahead.”
5This measurement is “perimetry,” and although a person’s visual field is perceived using both
eyes together, testing is done on each eye independently.
Visual field tests are either
kinetic
or
static
. Kinetic tests are those in which the stimulus is moved from
inward until the patient is able to see it. A static test is defined by the changing intensity of the stimulus
until the patient is able to perceive its presence. Once the patient acknowledges the stimulus, its location
changes. Modern static testing (e.g., Humphrey) does not test one location at a time, but uses a computer
to analyze the data from the all the locations at the conclusion of the test.
The following sections describe the various types of testing for peripheral field of vision:
TYPES OF VISUAL FIELD TESTING
Confrontation visual fields
Tangent screen
Goldmann perimetry
Automated visual fields
Confrontational visual fields:
The gross screening measurement of a patient’s visual field is the
confrontational visual field and is often performed by the ophthalmic technician during a comprehensive
workup. In this kinetic test, the tester’s eye is used as the patient’s fixation point, and the tester’s fingers
are the peripheral stimulae. In order to approximate the patient’s visual field, it is important that the
technician’s eyes be on the same plane as the patient’s and that the tester has closed the eye opposite
the patient’s closed eye. The finger stimulae should be equidistant between the patient and the
technician, and given in all quadrants of vision. Should a defect be identified, it should be recorded in the
chart, and the physician will determine if further visual field testing will be necessary.
Tangent screen:
This test measures the central 30 degrees of a patient’s visual field. Seated
approximately 1 meter from the black felt tangent screen, the patient is asked to identify a white, circular
target attached to the end of a black wand. This target travels along the meridians of the screen, which
are separated by 30 degrees. Depending on the patient’s visual acuity, the target will vary in size from 1
to 50 millimeters. When the stimulus is acknowledged, the tester will note the point on a chart using a pin,
later transferring the results to a recording chart. This test is rarely used in today’s highly technological
environment, but when used, provides a gross screening of peripheral field of vision. This can be used as
well to document non-physiologic (not real) loss of vision.
Goldmann perimetry:
This bowl-like instrument is constructed so the patient’s eye is centered in the
hemisphere. The test object is moved from the periphery towards the center of the bowl either
mechanically or manually until the patient signals having seen it; defining it as a kinetic test. The patient’s
responses are then mapped onto the recording chart along with the size of the stimulus, its color, test
distance (33 centimeters), patient cooperation, and reliability. This is often used with low-vision patients,
or those physically unable to perform automated testing.
Automated visual field testing:
Included in this group of static testing instruments are the Humphrey
and Octopus machines. With the fellow eye patched, patients are instructed to fixate straight ahead and
indicate when they see the stimulus. The stimulus will be presented in each location at different intensities
until the threshold intensity is determined at each location. The “threshold” intensity is the intensity at
which the stimulus is visible 50 percent of the time. For this reason, the same points are tested multiple
times during each test. This test is based on the premise that as the brightness of the stimulus increases,
the likelihood of detection by the patient increases. Different computer algorithms (e.g., SITA Standard
5
Cassin, Barbara; Dictionary of Eye Terminology 4
th
Edition; Triad Publishing Company; p. 276