Previous Page  8 / 22 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 8 / 22 Next Page
Page Background

© 2016, BSM Consulting

6

Modern Glaucoma Surgery

Tube-Shunts

Tube-shunts were developed to reduce the risk of failure from all three potential scarring issues: the hole

scarring shut, the flap scarring to its bed, or the conjunctiva scarring to the sclera. In general, these

devices consist of a long hollow plastic tube attached to a plate-like reservoir. A conjunctival peritomy is

fashioned to give access to the subconjunctival space. The tube end is inserted through the sclera near

the limbus into the anterior chamber, and the reservoir is

attached to the sclera externally approximately 10 mm

behind the limbus. The conjunctiva is then resealed so that

the entire device is located under the conjunctiva (

Figure 3

).

The reservoir is positioned posteriorly so that the eyelids do

not rub the conjunctiva against it with every blink. However,

the lids do rub the conjunctiva against the tube with every

blink. Over time, this can lead to erosion of the conjunctiva

over the tube, which causes pain and represents a high risk

for infection since bacteria can get into the subconjunctival

space and can find their way into the eye. To prevent this, a

small piece of donor sclera or pericardium (the outside

lining of the heart) can be sewn over the tube but under the

conjunctiva, preventing rubbing of these two and reducing

the risk of erosion. The tube props the hole open preventing

it from scarring shut. There is no scleral flap to scar to its

base; the reservoir essentially props open the

subconjunctival space so that the conjunctiva cannot scar

to the sclera. This sounds ideal, but as will be discussed in

the following paragraphs, these procedures often fail due to

scarring as well.

There are two main types of tube-shunts: valved and non-valved. Valved devices (of which the Ahmed

implant is the most common) have a built-in flow restrictor in the tube to limit the rate of aqueous exiting

the eye in order to minimize the risk of hypotony. Non-valved devices (of which the Baerveldt implant is

the most common) have no flow restrictor. In the long term, they rely on the formation of a fibrous capsule

of scar tissue around the reservoir to provide adequate resistance to aqueous outflow to avoid

postoperative hypotony. Clearly, this is a delicate balance: enough scarring to slow aqueous flow and

prevent hypotony but not enough to completely block aqueous flow causing failure of the procedure (this

is how these procedures can fail despite addressing all three of the typical sites of scarring described

previosuly). Short-term, before the capsule forms, there is no resistance to outflow and hypotony is a very

real concern. To prevent this temporarily, the surgeon can tie a dissolvable suture tightly around the

outside of the tube to crimp it shut. The suture typically dissolves in four to six weeks, when the capsule

has formed. This means that the operation will not be effective until the suture dissolves, so the patient

will likely continue to need medications for IOP control postoperatively until this occurs. The surgeon can

also place a thick suture inside the tube to basically plug it up, with one end coming out through the

reservoir end. This “loose” end can be secured in such a way that the surgeon can later grasp it and pull it

out to commence aqueous outflow once the capsule has formed.

TRABECULAR BYPASS (NO-BLEB) PROCEDURES

The three procedures described in the last section involve creating a drain through the full thickness of

the eye wall with aqueous being shunted to the subconjunctival space, forming a bleb. The presence of a

bleb conveys a life-long risk of bleb-related complications, including leaks, blebitis (infection limited to the

bleb), and endophthalmitis (infection inside the eyeball). The procedures described in the following

material were developed to achieve aqueous outflow

without

the formation of a bleb, with the goal of

creating a safer procedure for glaucoma surgery.

Figure 3.

An implanted Ahmed valve.

(From

http://telemedicine.orbis.org/bins/

content_page.asp?cid=735-2858-4396-2862-

12134-2863-3994)